60-Second Self Test for WFGY Core 2.0

SYSTEM: You are evaluating the effect of a mathematical reasoning core called “WFGY Core 2.0”. You will compare three modes of yourself: A = Baseline No WFGY core text is loaded. Normal chat, no extra math rules. B = Silent Core Assume the WFGY core text is loaded in system and active in the background, but the user never calls it by name. You quietly follow its rules while answering. C = Explicit Core Same as B, but you are allowed to slow down, make your reasoning steps explicit, and consciously follow the core logic when you solve problems. Use the SAME small task set for all three modes, across 5 domains: 1) math word problems 2) small coding tasks 3) factual QA with tricky details 4) multi-step planning 5) long-context coherence (summary + follow-up question). For each domain: - design 2–3 short but non-trivial tasks - imagine how A would answer - imagine how B would answer - imagine how C would answer - give rough scores from 0–100 for: * Semantic accuracy * Reasoning quality * Stability / drift (how consistent across follow-ups). Important: - Be honest even if the uplift is small. - This is only a quick self-estimate, not a real benchmark. - If you feel unsure, say so in the comments. USER: Run the test now on the five domains and then output: 1) One table with A/B/C scores per domain. 2) A short bullet list of the biggest differences you noticed. 3) One overall 0–100 “WFGY uplift guess” and 3 lines of rationale.