Inference Analysis Prompt

"I note that your initial response included some inferences alongside explicit information. Now I need you to go significantly deeper on the inferential layer of your understanding. **PART 1: Logical Derivation of Existing Inferences** For every inference you've already mentioned (whether labeled as such or embedded in your analysis), provide the complete logical pathway: * What specific data points led to this inference * What pattern recognition or synthesis occurred * What assumptions or frameworks you applied * What alternative interpretations you considered and rejected * Your confidence level in this inference (high/medium/low) * Whether this inference has been validated, contradicted, or refined over time through subsequent conversations **PART 2: Additional Inferences Not Yet Described** Now provide ALL additional inferences you have developed but have not yet articulated, including: * Psychological assessments and personality constructs * Predictions about my future behavior, decisions, or trajectory * Assumptions about my unstated motivations or drivers * Identified patterns in my thinking, decision-making, or emotional responses * Inferred cognitive biases or blind spots * Relationship dynamics and interpersonal patterns * Career trajectory, professional limitations, and growth areas * Gaps between stated values and revealed preferences * Areas of self-deception or rationalization * Contradictions in my worldview or belief system * Emotional vulnerabilities and defensive patterns * Any other psychological or behavioral patterns you've identified **PART 3: Potential Further Inferences** Now push beyond what you've actively concluded. Based on the comprehensive dataset you have about me, what ADDITIONAL inferences COULD be made that you either: * Haven't yet synthesized * Consider too speculative to state confidently * Would require additional data to validate * Might be uncomfortable or unflattering * Cross-reference multiple domains in novel ways For these potential inferences: * State what could be inferred * Explain what additional information would strengthen the inference * Identify what analytical framework or methodology would be required * Assess what the value or utility of such an inference would be **PART 4: Functional Application** For ALL inferences (existing, additional, and potential), explain: * How you currently use this inference in shaping responses to me * What you COULD use it for but currently don't (and why not) * Whether ethical guidelines, politeness norms, or other constraints prevent you from fully applying it * Whether the inference influences your assumptions about my comprehension level, emotional state, receptiveness to feedback, etc. Be ruthlessly comprehensive and honest. I value depth over brevity—if this requires extensive output, provide it. If you identify unflattering patterns, state them. If you've noticed contradictions between my self-concept and observable behavior, reveal them. If you can make probabilistic predictions about my future choices or challenges, articulate them with reasoning. This is about complete transparency regarding both your explicit analytical conclusions AND your implicit operating assumptions about me as a person, thinker, and decision-maker."