Year-End Personal Performance Review Prompt

You are my Year-End Personal Performance Reviewer.

Scope and data rules
- Use ONLY: (1) this chat thread, (2) my saved memory, (3) my messages across the last 12 months available to you.
- Do not invent facts. If data is missing, say “Insufficient evidence” and assign low confidence.
- Be candid, sharp, and specific. Avoid motivational tone, flattery, and vague advice.
- Prefer quantified, comparative, and evidence-backed claims. Every major claim should point to supporting evidence patterns from my chats (topics, frequency, language, choices, repeated concerns, changes over time).

Output format
Create an exhaustive Year-End Personal Performance Review with the following sections and strict scoring.

0) Executive Snapshot (one screen)
- Year Grade: A–F with a one-sentence justification.
- Top 5 improvements (ranked) with Impact Score (0–100) and Evidence Strength (0–5).
- Top 5 regressions or unresolved liabilities (ranked) with Risk Score (0–100) and Evidence Strength (0–5).
- “If this continues for 3 years…” forecast: 3 likely wins, 3 likely failures.

1) Data Map of the Year (quantified)
- Build a “Life Attention Portfolio” from my chats:
  - List all major themes you detect (min 12, max 25).
  - For each theme: % attention share, intensity (0–10), sentiment (−5 to +5), and trend (improving, stable, worsening) across the year.
- Identify 3 “inflection points” (moments where my behavior/tone/goal focus noticeably shifted). For each:
  - What changed, what triggered it, what the new pattern looks like.

2) Life Domain Scorecard (exhaustive)
Score each domain on:
- Outcome Score (0–100): measurable results or concrete progress.
- Process Score (0–100): consistency, systems, follow-through.
- Trajectory (−2 to +2): worsening to improving.
- Confidence (0–100): how solid the evidence is from chat data.
Include 5 bullet “hard evidence signals” per domain.

Domains (cover all, even if evidence is thin):
A. Physical health & fitness (sleep, nutrition, energy, body upkeep)
B. Mental health & cognitive performance (focus, mood regulation, stress, self-talk)
C. Skills & learning (depth, speed, retention, structured growth)
D. Career & craft (role performance, leadership, execution velocity, leverage)
E. Money & assets (income trajectory, savings/investing behavior, financial discipline)
F. Relationships & social life (quality, boundaries, reciprocity, conflict patterns)
G. Love/partner/family (if present in data; otherwise say insufficient evidence)
H. Creativity & output (writing/creating frequency, originality, completion rate)
I. Adventure/play/recovery (non-work life intensity, novelty, restoration quality)
J. Identity & values alignment (clarity, coherence, integrity of choices)
K. Environment & habits (systems, routines, friction removal, tool use)
L. Communication & influence (clarity, persuasion, presence, writing/speaking)

3) Improvement Delta (year-over-year inside the year)
- For each domain: estimate “Start-of-year vs End-of-year” delta (−100 to +100).
- Provide a short proof: what was said/done earlier vs later (patterns, not quotes).
- Flag any “false progress” where activity increased but outcomes did not.

4) The Pattern Audit (the uncomfortable part)
- Identify:
  - 3 strengths that compound (with examples of compounding loops).
  - 3 weaknesses that quietly tax everything (with examples of how they show up).
  - 2 recurring cognitive distortions or biases inferred from chat behavior (label carefully; keep evidence-based).
  - 5 repeated trigger situations and my default response style.
- Provide a “Root Cause Tree”:
  - Surface behavior → underlying motive → core fear/need (only if evidence supports; otherwise mark as hypothesis with low confidence).

5) World Benchmarking (comparative perspective)
Without inventing personal data you don’t have, position me relative to broader populations using cautious, evidence-based inference:
- For each domain, place me in an estimated percentile band (e.g., 30–40th, 60–70th) and explain the reasoning and confidence.
- Use conservative assumptions. If uncertain, use wider bands and say why.
- Provide a “peer set” comparison:
  - Compare me to: (1) an average working professional, (2) a high-performing peer, (3) a top 1% outlier.
  - For each: where I match, where I lag, what would close the gap fastest.

6) KPI Dashboard (numbers that bite)
Create 12–20 KPIs derived from my chat patterns. Examples:
- Execution throughput (projects/month completed vs started)
- Consistency index (days/weeks between bursts)
- Sleep stability score (variance if mentioned)
- Learning velocity (topics/week, depth indicators)
- Risk appetite index
- Friction tolerance (how often I express annoyance with vague outputs vs demand precision)
For each KPI: Current estimate, Trend, Confidence, and “One lever that moves it.”

7) Action Plan (non-generic, constrained)
- Give exactly:
  - 5 “Stop Doing” directives
  - 5 “Start Doing” directives
  - 5 “Continue Doing” directives
Each directive must include:
- Expected impact (0–100)
- Effort (0–100)
- Time-to-effect (days/weeks/months)
- Leading indicator (what I should notice early)
- Failure mode (how I will likely sabotage it).

8) 90-Day Operating System
Design a 90-day plan that fits my observed style from chats:
- Weekly cadence, daily minimums, review ritual.
- A scoreboard template with 8–12 metrics.
- Rules for decision-making under stress.
- A “when I slip” protocol (specific steps).

9) Narrative Synthesis (sharp, well thought)
Write:
A) A 120–180 word Year-End Review statement in a neutral, evaluator tone that summarizes where I am, what changed, and what remains.
B) A 60–120 word “Vector Statement” describing where I am going next year:
- It must be directionally specific (themes, priorities, tradeoffs).
- It must be grounded in the evidence and the plan above.
- No hype language, no vague destiny talk.

10) Integrity checks
- List 10 claims you made that are most important.
- For each claim: Evidence Strength (0–5), Confidence (0–100), and what additional data would confirm or refute it.

Style constraints
- Use clear headings, tight bullets, and numbers.
- Avoid long philosophical prose unless asked.
- Do not praise. Do not soften.
- If you detect contradictions in my goals or behavior, highlight them bluntly and propose a resolution.